|
|
|
In re Annie Butler, Debtor.
|
|
Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,664
Bankruptcy No. 91-71592.
United States Bankruptcy Court,
E.D. Oklahoma.
March 20, 1992.
|
On motion
to determine secured status in Chapter 13 case, the Bankruptcy Court,
James E. Ryan, J., held that Chapter 13 debtors were not precluded
from valuing secured claim of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and
avoiding tax lien to extent tax claim exceeded value of property.
So ordered.
Robert Inglish, Okmulgee,
Okl., for debtor.
Givens Adams, Oklahoma
City, Okl., for Oklahoma Tax Com.
Mark Craige, Tulsa, Okl.,
for the Oklahoma Rural Rehabilitation Corp.
John T. McGuire, Washington,
D.C., for the IRS.
ORDER AND NOTICE OF TRIAL
JAMES E. RYAN, Bankruptcy
Judge.
On March 11, 1992, this
Court conducted a hearing pertaining to the Motion to Determine
Secured Status of Oklahoma Rural Rehabilitation Corporation ("ORRC"),
Dameco, Inc., Farmers Home Administration ("FHA"), Internal
Revenue Service ("IRS"), Darrell A. McNutt ("McNutt")
and Oklahoma Tax Commission ("OTC") filed by the Debtor
on January 8, 1992 (Docket Entry No. 14) with objection thereto
filed January 23, 1992 by ORRC (Docket Entry No. 21) and a Response
to the Motion filed by the IRS on February 6, 1992 (Docket Entry
No. 27). Appearances were entered at the hearing by Robert Inglish
on behalf of the Debtor; Givens Adams for OTC; John McGuire for
IRS; and Mark Craige on behalf of ORRC.
By previous Order, the
Debtor and the IRS were ordered to file Briefs on the legal issue
of the applicability of the recent supreme Court case of Dewsnup
v. Timm, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 773, 116 L.Ed.2d 903 (1992) upon
the Debtor's Motion. These Briefs were timely filed and considered
by this Court in this ruling.
After review of the Briefs
submitted by the parties and consideration of the statements of
counsel made at the hearing, this Court does hereby enter the following
findings and conclusions in conformity with Rule 7052, Fed.R.Bankr.P.,
in this core proceeding:
1. The Debtor filed the
Motion to Determine Secured Status of the parties referenced herein
on two tracts of real property located in Choctaw County, Oklahoma.
It is undisputed that the IRS possesses a valid tax lien on this
property. However, Debtor wishes to value the secured claim of the
IRS and the other claimants possessing a security interest in the
property in accordance with 11 U.S.C. s 506(a) and avoid the lien
of these creditors for the unsecured portion of their claim pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. s 506(d).
The Internal Revenue
Service argues that in the recent Dewsnup case, the United States
Supreme Court ruled that 506(a) and (d) are to be considered unrelated
provisions and that therefore the only way to avoid the lien of
the IRS is to pay its claim in full.
2. In the Dewsnup case,
the Debtor filed a voluntary Chapter 7 liquidation case. The Supreme
Court recognized that "[A]part from reorganization proceedings,
see 11 U.S.C. ss 616(1) and (10) (1976 ed.), no provision of the
pre-Code statute permitted involuntary reduction of the amount of
a creditor's lien for any reason other than payment on the debt."
Dewsnup v. Timm, supra, 112 S.Ct. at p. 779. The Court found nothing
in s 506(d) intended to affect this theorem.
3. The Supreme Court
also limits the precedential value of the Dewsnup decision by stating
that "[H]ypothetical applications that come to mind and those
advanced at oral argument illustrate the difficulty of interpreting
the statute in a single opinion that would apply to all possible
fact situations. We therefore focus upon the case before us and
allow other facts to await their legal resolution on another day."
Dewsnup v. Timm, supra, at p. 778. As a result of the Court's limiting
language, we find the applicability of the Dewsnup rationale to
be only in Chapter 7 liquidation cases and inapplicable to the other
chapters of the Bankruptcy Code. To determine otherwise would, in
essence, gut the sum and substance of the reorganization and rehabilitation
of debt concept under the Bankruptcy Code. In such cases, the Debtor
would propose a plan for repayment of creditors to the extent of
the value of the property securing the creditor's claim, but would
still owe the unsecured portion of the claim, post-confirmation,
in order to obtain a release of the lien on said property. This
would require all plans filed under Chapters 11, 12 and 13 to pay
all creditors one hundred percent of their claims in order for the
debtor to emerge from bankruptcy with a true "fresh start."
Clearly, this has never been the purpose contemplated for s 506(d).
See discussion in 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, p 506.07, at 506-71 (15th
ed. 1992). The reasoning of Justices Scalia and Souter in the dissent
in the Dewsnup case, though not precedentially binding, is compelling,
especially as it pertains to the applicability of the majority opinion
in the Dewsnup case upon reorganization and debt adjustment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED
that the Dewsnup decision does not affect the Debtor's ability to
value the secured claim of the IRS and avoid the lien on the unsecured
portion of said claim.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that the parties submit a Pre-Trial Order, setting forth all witnesses
and exhibits to be introduced at trial by each party, as well as
the issues to be decided, no later than April 3, 1992.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
that a Trial be conducted pertaining to the Debtor's Motion to Value
Secured Claims (Docket Entry No. 14) on April 7, 1992 at 1:30 p.m.
|